Skip to main content

Insight · June 18, 2026

Designing around
the machine.

Midjourney shipped a body scanner. The device was the easy part.

01 · What shipped

A working machine, not a concept.

You step into a shallow pool of warm water. A ring of half a million sensors sends sound through your body from every angle. About a minute later you have a 3D map of your insides down to a fraction of a millimeter. No radiation. No tube. No lying perfectly still.

It is ultrasound, carrying the resolution of an MRI. A full body scan in 60 seconds instead of an hour in a tube. They are calling it the Midjourney Scanner, and yes, it is the same Midjourney that makes the images.

60s

Full body scan

100x

Faster than an MRI

10x

Cheaper

9

People who built it

The film

A technical dive inside the Midjourney Scanner · Midjourney Medical →

02 · The category they walked into

A market that was supposed to be impossible to enter.

Medical imaging belongs to a handful of giants. The moat was supposed to be the physics, the capital, the regulators, the decades of installed base and service contracts. It is the kind of category a sane founder is told to never touch.

A team of nine, at a company known for generating pictures, shipped a working machine into it anyway. Not a slide. Not a render. A device you can stand inside.

The reframe

“They did not build a hospital machine. They built a spa. The scan is a side effect of a place you would want to be anyway.”

03 · The move

They redesigned the room, not the device.

The incumbents spent decades optimizing the machine. Stronger magnets, tighter tolerances, faster reconstruction. Every gain lived inside the same anxious experience. A cold tube. A loud room. A reason to be afraid before you arrive.

Midjourney left the device alone and rebuilt everything around it. Warm water instead of a tube. A place you would choose to visit instead of a place you are sent. The scan stopped being the point and became the thing that happens while you relax.

That is the whole story compressed into one decision. The spec sheet was never the product. The experience was, and the team that owns the experience owns the category.

A glowing gold cross section of the body with each muscle and organ labeled by name, the output of the Ultrasonic CT method
Ultrasonic CT · every structure named down to a fraction of a millimeter · Midjourney

04 · Why the image company

It is the same problem wearing a different coat.

Generating an image and reconstructing a body are the same discipline underneath. Both take incomplete, noisy signal and resolve it into a coherent picture. Midjourney spent years getting very good at exactly that, then pointed the competence at sound waves instead of pixels.

This is not a company doing something random. It is a company following its core skill into an adjacent market that nobody thought it was allowed to enter. The adjacency was always there. Most teams just never look up from the category they are told they belong to.

05 · Nine people

The headcount a hard category now requires.

A decade ago a project like this needed hundreds of people and a war chest. The number that should stop you is nine. The tooling collapsed the team you need to attempt something this ambitious, and a small group with sharp taste now reaches what used to require an institution.

This is the part worth internalizing. Small teams are not a constraint to apologize for. With the right leverage they are the advantage. Fewer people, more taste, faster decisions, and nobody to slow the one idea that matters.

Closing

The machine was the easy part.

The hard part was everything around it. The water, the room, the reason to come back. That is the work, and it is the work most teams leave undone.

Donny Smith

Written by · June 18, 2026

· ECD, Founder, Bttr.

Over the past 15 years, he has led creative teams and contributed to products used by millions of people worldwide, working with companies including Apple, Opendoor, JP Morgan, GE Aerospace, Pepsi, and Alterra Mountain Company.

LinkedIn

Imagery and figures · Midjourney Medical · A New Era of Midjourney →

Share this perspective

More insights

Adjacent perspectives.

What Is a Knowledge Graph

8 min read

What Is a Knowledge Graph

A knowledge graph stores facts and how they connect. Real world things, people, places, products, concepts, become entities, and the links between them, founded by, located in, reports to, become named relationships you can query rather than infer. The unit is the triple, subject, predicate, object, the shape the W3C standardized as RDF. Google made the idea famous when it launched the Knowledge Graph on May 16, 2012 with 500 million objects and 3.5 billion facts, framing the shift as things, not strings. The reason it is back is GraphRAG. Microsoft Research showed that vector retrieval struggles to connect the dots across documents and to answer questions about a whole corpus, and a graph follows the links instead. When the answer sits in one passage, use a vector index. When it lives in the connections between facts, use the graph.

RAG vs Fine-Tuning

9 min read

RAG vs Fine-Tuning

The teams that waste the most on AI pick RAG or fine-tuning before they name the problem. The two are not answers to the same question. RAG gives a model facts it can look up at answer time, retrieved from your own documents, cut into chunks, turned into embeddings, and searched by meaning. The fact never enters the weights. Anthropic notes that once a knowledge base passes roughly 200,000 tokens, retrieval is what lets a model draw on a corpus no prompt could hold. Fine-tuning does the opposite. It trains the base model on your examples until a tone, a format, or a task is set into the weights, which the OpenAI Cookbook notes can take thousands of worked examples and suits teaching a skill rather than a fact. The clean rule is RAG for facts, fine-tuning for behavior, and in production usually both. The Cookbook frames it as an exam: fine-tuning is studying a week ahead and risking a forgotten detail, RAG is the open notes exam with the answer in front of the model while it works. Freshness, cost, and the paper trail settle the rest. A fact that changes is a retrieval problem. A behavior that drifts is a training problem. Name the problem first and the tool picks itself.

What Is Reranking

8 min read

What Is Reranking

A retrieval system usually finds the right passage and then leaves it in the wrong place. The first stage is a bi encoder that turns the query and every document into separate vectors and compares them, which is fast but never reads the two together, so the best passage often lands in the middle of the list. Reranking is the second pass that fixes the order. A cross encoder reads the query and one candidate as a single input, scores how they actually relate, and reorders the short list so the most relevant passages rise to the top. It is slower because it computes a fresh score for every query and document pair, so it runs on about a hundred candidates, never the whole corpus. On the public MS MARCO benchmark the sentence transformers cross encoder models trade speed for accuracy across sizes, from a tiny model near 9,000 documents a second to larger ones a fraction of that. Anthropic measured the payoff on a real pipeline: retrieve 150 chunks, rerank, keep the top 20, and the failure rate fell 67%. Retrieval finds the passage. Reranking makes sure the model reads it first.

Industries We Serve

Aerospace & DefenseBiotechnologyMedical & HealthcareManufacturingFinancial ServicesConsumer ProductsEnterprise Software

New Business

Start a project

Headquarters

North America

© 2026 Bttr. All rights reserved.