January 2026
The Simulation
Worldview
Every Silicon Valley startup pitches a simulated, modeled future. The map has replaced the territory.
Every pitch deck tells the same story. We will model your business. Predict your customers. Optimize your operations. Simulate every outcome before it happens.
The assumption runs deep. If we can measure it, we can model it. If we can model it, we can predict it. If we can predict it, we can control it.
The map is not the territory. The model is not the system.
The Failures
The world resists modeling. It resists prediction. It resists the clean lines of a simulation. The best weather models fail a week out. Economic models miss every recession. Social models fail to anticipate any cultural shift that matters.
And yet we keep building products that assume the model IS the reality. That treat the dashboard as truth. That mistake correlation for causation. That confuse precision with accuracy.
The Problem
The simulation worldview creates products that work brilliantly in demos and fail catastrophically in reality. They optimize for the modeled world, not the actual one.
Every model is a simplification. Every simplification is a loss. Every loss matters in ways we cannot predict.
The hubris is not in building models. Models are useful. The hubris is in forgetting they are incomplete. In treating them as oracles rather than approximations.
The Pattern
The same story plays out across industries. A model works in testing. It gets deployed. Reality diverges from the model. The system fails. Everyone is surprised.
Black-Scholes assumed markets were rational. They built trillion-dollar positions on this assumption. When markets stopped being rational, they collapsed.
Optimized for engagement metrics. Created filter bubbles, radicalization pipelines, and mental health crises. The model worked. The outcome was disaster.
Trained on millions of miles. Still fail at scenarios no simulation anticipated. An edge case to a model is just Tuesday to reality.
Predicted curves and peaks with precision. Missed human behavior, political will, supply chains, and everything else that mattered.
The simulation worldview isn't wrong because simulations are useless. It's wrong because it forgets they're incomplete.
Build for variance.
Not just means.
What Good Looks Like
The best products know what they do not know. They build for the unexpected. They design for failure modes, not just success paths. They respect the complexity they cannot capture.
They treat models as tools, not truths. As starting points, not destinations. As maps that are always, necessarily, incomplete.
We believe:
- 1Models are hypotheses. They should be tested, not trusted. Validated, not venerated.
- 2Edge cases are not edge cases. They are the moments when your product meets reality.
- 3Graceful degradation is required. When the model fails, the product should not.
- 4Human override is non-negotiable. No system should be trusted more than the people using it.
What We Build
Robust Systems
Products that work when assumptions fail. Designed for the unexpected, not just the modeled.
Transparent Predictions
AI that shows its uncertainty. Models that communicate their limitations.
Human-Centered Automation
Systems that augment human judgment, not replace it. Tools, not oracles.
Reality-Tested Products
Built for actual conditions, not simulated ones. Validated in the wild.
Is your product designed for the model?
Or for reality?
Share this perspective
More Insights
Perspectives on product design, technology, and the forces shaping how people interact with the things we build.
The companies that build for reality instead of simulation will own the markets that matter. The ones where failure has consequences.